It is true that in societies, by virtue of what industry leads Edgar Morin called the «festival of uncertainties», the thirst for political authority has been accentuated, but a demand for greater public protection has also become generalised. The first could give rise to a industry leads more authoritarian political order, while the second could be the origin of a more just social order. Politics will decide which fate you choose: the politics of fear or the politics of protection. The industry leads uncertain future seems open to two possible destinations: the «politics of survival», as Marc Abeles defines it, or the «politics of well-being» .
There is a risk, however, in the performative industry leads link between language and the future: that the discussion is "confined" to the language of health or the language of technology. We will not only need new interfaces, nor is it desirable to move towards a industry leads world ruled by epidemiological technocracy (of inevitable elective affinity with paranoid atomization). We will need to reinvent a new normality, based on a "new morality" of solidarity and on a legitimized industry leads State to truly orient itself towards protection, equality and well-being. To think about what I have called, borrowing a creation by Luis
Alberto Quevedo, «new morality», the ideas of industry leads Robert Putnam, theoretical descendant of Alexis de Tocqueville, who has investigated the reasons why democracy and its main Institutions work better in societies endowed with greater social capital, industry leads that is, based on relationships of trust, norms of reciprocity and networks of civic engagement. On this point, it is worth asking ourselves about what kind of new morality is being forged during the industry leads confinement. We could think, with a more dystopian tone, that this fear-tinged experience will deepen processes of atomization and paranoid individualism, expanding what